LinkedIn Is Putting Social Selling Index Behind Sales Navigator

LinkedIn has announced that access to the LinkedIn Social Selling Index will stay only with a Sales Navigator licence. I show what you see on an account with a licence and without one, what you lose (one thing is a loss, the rest is not) and what to look at instead of this score.

I would not have noticed myself. I have had Sales Navigator since its beta, roughly since 2015, so SSI works for me the way it always did. It only clicked when I logged into an account without a licence.

What you see without a licence

The address linkedin.com/sales/ssi still works. No redirect, no error, the page loads, only there is a red banner across the top:

Your access to the Social Selling Index (SSI) page will be discontinued soon. SSI is a Sales Navigator feature. Get Sales Navigator to retain access to SSI.

Below, where the score should be, sits an empty state with a palm tree and the line „Sorry, it looks like we don’t have data available for you right now”.

The second sentence of that banner is the one that matters. „SSI is a Sales Navigator feature. Get Sales Navigator to retain access to SSI”, which translated from LinkedIn into plain English means: this belongs to the paid product, you want to keep it, then buy it. They are not even pretending they are „improving” anything.

Has LinkedIn already killed the public SSI page, as some people online are writing? No. The banner is in the future tense („will be discontinued soon”) and the page still opens. That is why in my LinkedIn change register this entry sits as an announcement, not as a rollout.

What the same place looks like with a licence

On my account there is no warning at all. There is the full report: the overall score, the split into four components and three comparison cards.

Looks respectable, doesn’t it? So let us take those numbers apart. LinkedIn trainers rarely show their own SSI, and mine is a good example of how little the number says.

My score: 65 out of 100. So what?

My LinkedIn SSI score is 65 out of 100. Back when I tried to push everything up, I got to 85. It changed nothing in my life or my sales. The average in my industry is 34, so I am in the top 1%, and in the top 2% of my own network. Sounds good, the ego swells, and so what.

Now the four components:

Component	My score
Establish your professional brand	21,174
Find the right people	9,025
Engage with insights	9,7
Build relationships	25

Third row: 9,7 out of a possible 25 for „engaging with insights”. From someone who makes a living from LinkedIn, has trained two hundred companies and publishes regularly. A week ago it was 5, because I published nothing over the summer, and then I posted once and it pulled in a few dozen thousand views. One post doubled the number.

Does that mean I engage badly? No. It means I do not do it the way LinkedIn wants to measure it, because I do not click through as much content as the platform would like and I do not publish daily to feed their algorithm. The score does not measure effectiveness, only how closely your behaviour matches what the platform expects of you.

That is why I have called it a vanity metric for years. What is missing from those four components? The result. No conversations, no closed deals. You can have 75 points and sell nothing, and you can have 50 and a full pipeline.

By the way, if anyone wants 25 out of 25 on the first component, the one about building a personal brand, which really means filling in your profile: if you are Polish and did not study at a well-known American or British university, you will not get there. I have filled in everything there is and I have 21,174 out of 25, because there is one field I cannot fill: which collegiate league you belonged to. Collegiate leagues and alumni associations are a good source of leads and networking, but neither I nor probably you will ever fill that in.

Who this score was really for

If it measures activity and not results, why did it exist? The answer is hanging on the first screenshot. SSI was free for years because it was meant to create a sense of lack: show a low number to someone who then decides they need a better tool. It has played its marketing role, so it goes back where it belonged from the start, into the paid product.

I have no complaints about LinkedIn (that is how every product with a free sample works), I have them about the industry that spent years using this score as proof of competence: on business cards, in training offers and in posts starting with „my SSI is 80, what’s yours?”. Dear LinkedIn trainers, you can finally drop that slide from your employee advocacy workshops.

What you actually lose without SSI

One thing. Not the score, but the line on the „People in your industry” card telling you which industry the algorithm has assigned you to. Mine reads: Sales professionals in the Business Consulting and Services industry.

Why does it matter? Because that same assignment decides who LinkedIn shows your content to. I got burned by it myself: for years I listed every university I had lectured at on my profile, until the algorithm reclassified me from consultant to academic lecturer. Reach collapsed and entirely the wrong people started clicking under my posts. I wrote about it at length in the piece on how the LinkedIn algorithm actually works.

That screenshot is also proof the fix worked, because today I am where I want to be. SSI was the simplest way to check it in one click, and that is exactly the way that is disappearing.

How to check your industry without SSI

Can it be done? It can, just less comfortably. Two methods, both free:

1. Look at the suggested posts in your feed. LinkedIn labels them „Suggested post”, and when you click one it explains why it decided the content fits you. That is a literal description of your „tribe”. If you see topics from a completely different industry, the algorithm has put you somewhere you did not want to be.
2. Go through the list of people who viewed your profile. If there is nobody from your market and from the companies you care about, something in your profile is sending the wrong signal.

Both methods are less clear-cut than one line in a report, but they have one advantage: they show the state today, not a number recalculated every so often.

What to replace SSI with

LinkedIn replaced SSI with a score called Sales Navigator Coach.

I replace it with KPIs closer to sales. The number of sales conversations started from Sales Navigator. The number of replies to InMails. The conversion from invitations sent to invitations accepted. Those translate into money, and LinkedIn will never count them for you.

If you want something closer to social media, look at Saves and Sends in your post analytics. They show that somebody found the content worth keeping or worth passing on under their own name, and that is a far stronger signal than a like, which costs nothing. I unpacked both in the piece on dark social analytics.

And should you buy Sales Navigator to keep access to SSI? No. A score I have criticised for years does not become valuable because you now have to pay for it. Navigator earns its money through search, lead lists and alerts, and SSI is a side dish in it, not an argument.

What follows from this

What changes in your daily work on LinkedIn? Not much. Because if you treated SSI seriously as a measure of success, you were measuring the wrong thing anyway.

Something else changes: LinkedIn stopped pretending. For years I explained why this score is not what people take it for. Now a screenshot with their own sentence does the job: SSI is a Sales Navigator feature.

If you want to work out what to measure in your case so that it has something to do with sales, book a consultation. We will go through your data and pick the numbers that mean something.